Mind Set by John Naisbitt

Below are my blink reactions and main take-a-ways from Naisbitt's book.  Anyone read it previously & have other thoughts?  If you're interested in borrowing MS, I can burn you a CD...let me know.
  • This book is probably required in a good deal of business schools...very focused on different ways of thinking about the economy on a global scale.
  • Not having to be right when predicting the future is liberating.  Having to be right is a burden and none of us should think we need to be right about the future all the time (at most!).
  • The Future is embedded in the present - figuring out what it is, is the difficult part.
  • Don't add anything new to your organization without eliminating something (sunsetting anyone?)
  • High-tech, high-touch.  Every technology needs "a poet".  Tech by itself has a negative impact on humanity.
  • "Technology ecology".  What determines whether or not a technology is accepted & adopted?  What is displaced when we do accept a new technology?  The author feels many of us have a dysfunctional relationship w/ technology (wait, I have to check my iPhone...just kidding!)
  • We often over estimate change in the short term but under estimate change in the long term.
  • The newspaper, book, & novel cultures are in serious decline and are being reinvented as a new culture is being invented.
  • We're in the midst of a huge shift toward becoming a visual world.  Visual literacy is/will be as or more pronounced than the "written word".
  • Looking at the future is like putting a jigsaw puzzle together.  You can't do it in a linear fashion but have to recognize what disparate pieces go together.  Be prepared so that you can recognize the pieces that go together when you come into contact with them.
  • Change is local, not top down.  Look at the patterns that are emerging locally and extrapolate...these are the "megatrends" in their early forms.
  • Great chapter on China and it's booming economy.  I could see the people & country changing before my eyes  when I was there, just as Naisbitt explained.  Nice reminder.